Monday, 28 May 2012

Would you eat an Organic Orangutan?


                                                     Image by farmsantuary.org from flickr

Today everything ‘Organic’ is a fad. I came across organic salt few days ago and was baffled by its nonsensical nature. Salt is an inorganic compound and it just cannot be produced organically using fertilizers such as cows’ manure. I support many qualities of organic items but cannot ignore how ‘conscious’ consumers overlook other aspects of a sustainable product.

Naturally, since the beginning of agriculture organic farming has been prevalent. It was only after World War II that inorganic farming gained popularity. In particular two chemicals which had been produced for warfare started being used for farming.  Ammonium nitrate used in munitions during  World War became a cheap source for nitrogen. DDT which was initially used to control disease carrying insects round the troops, developed into the insecticide used in agriculture today [1]. Although organic farming is prehistoric, Sir Albert Howards is widely considered the father of organic farming as he was the key founder of the post-industrial-revolution organic movement [2].

Yes, organic agriculture is beneficial for soil biodiversity but, when done on a large scale it becomes very similar to inorganic agriculture. Large tracts of land are cleared, crop monocultures (same strain of a crop planted) are grown and the produce is transported for long distances. With mainstreaming of organic food, big corporations like Nestle and Walmart are growing their share in this market, causing huge losses to local farmers. These companies import most raw products from developing countries where environmental laws are grossly overlooked.

Think, how ecstatic can chickens be in profit-based organic poultry farms where they live in crammed conditions and are overfed? Do organic milk yielding cows really get to graze happily in large green fields? How sustainable is it to live in Ireland and buy Chinese organic potatoes?

It is promising to see people opting for greener lifestyles but there is a need to understand our choices in entirety and not be mislead by the ’Organic’ superstar.



REFERENCES

Thursday, 5 April 2012

Leather: Fate of the Holy Cow


Image by terrmith.deviantart.com 

   

---I DON'T STAND A CHANCE!!!

Image by Yogurinha Borova from Flickr 




I do not understand the sexual prowess of leather. How does such cruelly produced material cause arousal and is today an unofficial symbol of S & M, Goth, erotic fashion and other fetishes. There is actually a term called ‘Leather subculture’. When I see men and women strut their stuff in leather all I can think of are factory farms and  slaughter houses where animals are thrown together like stones. Billions of animals are slaughtered every year for the leather industry [1]. Mostly the animals are kept in miserable conditions like crowding, confinement, unanesthetized castration, dehorning, brutal transport and slaughter.

Since prehistoric times man has used leather for various purposes. In recorded history, pieces of leather dating from 1300 BC have been found in Egypt [2]. It is believed that primitive societies in Europe, Asia and North America developed techniques of using leather in garments, independent of one another. Later through unknown measures man learnt to preserve and soften leather treating animal skins with smoke, grease and bark extracts. Probably the art of tanning leather using oils from barks of trees (vegetable tanning) originated amongst the Hebrews [2]. In the 19th century vegetable tanning was supplemented by polluting chromium tanning and today chrome tanning has become predominant.

Most common leather source is cows and calves skin but it is also sourced from horse, sheep, pigs, lambs and goats. More exotic sources include snake, crocodiles, bison, kangaroos, seals, dolphins, frogs, lizards, elephants and zebras. Alligators are farmed specifically for their skins. One Georgia farmer had 10,000 alligators living in four buildings where hundreds of them filled every inch of each room [3]. Life span of alligators is 60 years but on farms they are butchered before they turn 2 years old [4]. They are beaten to death by a hammer or axe and sometimes die a slow death after being skinned alive.

It is shocking that in our society we have rules of killing animals in the name of style and fashion. In Australia the law states that kangaroos should be shot, although orphaned joeys and wounded adults are required to be decapitated or sharply hit on the head to destroy the brain [5]. Millions of kangaroos are butchered every year as their skin is main material of soccer shoes [6]. Snakes and lizards are skinned alive in many cases as it is supposed to make exotic leather suppler. Unborn calves and lambs are aborted or are obtained after killing of pregnant mothers and their skin is considered ‘luxurious’ [4]. Kid goats are boiled alive to make gloves [4].


Mostly hides for leather come from countries like India and China where animal rights are non-existent [7]. Old dairy cows are sold for their skins and calves are also raised for their skin. In India dozens of cows are transported in crammed conditions in trucks on bad roads, to the slaughter houses. Often they are killed carelessly and brutally.

Besides the animal cruelty that is caused by the leather industry, it also has a huge adverse environmental impact. Large tracts of land are cleared of trees to raise cattle and large amount of fossil fuels are required for livestock. Due to great number of animals in a single farm there is a lot of excreta produced as well. The excreta from cattle releases methane gas which is ~21 times more potent greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide. Run offs from feedlots and dairy farms is a major source of water pollution.

Tanneries are top polluters in the Environment protection Agency list [7]. Old tannery sites cannot be used for agriculture or be sold. As mentioned earlier, today leather is mostly chemically tanned using Chromium. It is estimated that a single chromium tanning facility uses up ~15,000 gallons of water and generates 2,200 pounds of solid waste for each ton of hide it processes [8]. In addition other pollutants released due to tanning are hair, flesh, salt, lime, sludge, acids and sulfides [8]. Leather finishing too requires many polluting substances such as formaldehyde, coal-tar derivatives, oils, dyes, finishes which are cyanide-based and mineral salts [4].

Leather industry pollution has lead to many health problems amongst humans. Arsenic which is a commonly used tannery chemical is associated with lung cancer for workers who are exposed to it for long. Many studies have established links between sinuses and lung cancers with the chromium used in tanning process [9].The Centre for Disease Control and Prevention in America found that the incidence of leukemia amongst residents in an area surrounding one tannery in Kentucky was five times the national average [10]. Moreover the chemicals which get released in water get bio-magnified and are dangerous for humans and biodiversity.


Why wear leather when there are so many more options which are fashionable as well. There is chemical leather available in the market now. Chlorenol is a synthetic material superior to leather in many ways. It is breathable, has a similar stretch as leather and is used for athletics and hiking shoes by many sports companies. There is a product called vegan microfiber which is equivalent to leather in strength and durability [7]. The market for environment friendly gear is on a rise and there is so much to choose from today.

Leather is harmful for the environment, for the animals and for the people who make it. Let us not be seduced by the sexual leather culture and dress with a conscience.


References

[1] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Slaughtered/Production Animals 2008, FAOSTAT Database, 2010. 

[2] Simply Leather (Wales) Ltd. History of Leather. http://www.simplyleather.co.uk/acatalog/History_of_Leather.html

[3] Stanley, E. “Chicken Again? These Gators Get a Steady Diet of Dead Fowl”. Los Angeles Times, 2001.


[5] Department of Environment and Heritage, Government of South Australia, 2007. The Kangaroo Conservation and Management Plan for South Australia 2008–2012.

[6] Australian Government Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage, and the Arts. “Background Information, Commercial Kangaroo and Wallaby Harvest Quotas 2010,” 2010.

[7] GAIAM life. How bad is leather and what are the alternatives. http://life.gaiam.com/article/how-bad-leather-and-what-are-alternatives

[8] Schubert, D. “Assessment of the Environmental Release of Chemicals From the Leather Processing Industry,” IC-07 Leather Processing Industry, 1998.

[9] Hayes, R.B. “The Carcinogenicity of Metals in Humans,” Cancer Causes and Control, 8 (1997), 371–85.

[10] Sclove et al. Community-Based Research in the United States (Amherst: The Loka Institute), 1998.

Tuesday, 24 January 2012

The Toilet Roll Saga

(Image by kiertoidea from Flickr)

I come from the land where we don’t Really wipe our bums. This might sound a bit obnoxious to the very loyal toilet paper supporters but is not that much of a dirty business. Water is a universal solvent not paper then how did products such as toilet roll and facial tissues become necessary items in our lives? How do they affect the environment and what can we do to reduce our poop impact? 

The first documented use of toilet paper dates back to the 6th century AD in early medieval China[1]. Joseph C. Gayette is recognised as the inventor of first commercial toilet paper which was sold in the USA in 1857 under his name[2]. Interestingly, prior to the vast commercialisation of toilet roll, civilisations across the globe had many ways of wiping their behinds e.g. the rich Romans used wool with rosewater, the Eskimos used snow and moss and ancient Jews are believed to have used pebbles which they carried in ‘special places’ in their bags[2].

Over half the population of the world does not use toilet roll. In many parts of the world people do not use them because of lack of trees. About 2.6 billion[3] people on our planet live without access to sanitary toilets. On the contrary, in 2005 estimated sale of toilet paper in the United States was worth $5.7 billion[3]. A shocking report by WWF states that everyday ~270,000 trees[4] are cut for the production of toilet roll, only to be flushed down the drain. Large amount of energy is used for their production and the chemicals used pollute the air and water.

This large scale deforestation has lead to huge ecosystem degradation in many parts of the world. Europe relies heavily on timber from Russia and the Baltic states for the production of toilet paper. One-third of timber logged in the north-west Russia and 50% logged in Estonia is illegal. These Illegal practises are putting native wildlife such as Amur tiger, white-backed woodpecker and Far Eastern leopard at high risk. Russia also loses about US$1 billion per year to illegal logging[5].

In developing countries such as Brazil, Chile, South Africa and Indonesia native virgin forests are being destroyed to make way for plantations to generate pulp for toilet roll production. One in four toilet rolls sold by New Zealands’ major retailers were found to come from Indonesian rainforest. Only 400 individuals[5] of critically endangered Sumatran tiger are believed to remain in the wild. Destruction of Indonesian rainforest is the biggest threat to the survival of these tigers and other species such as Orang-utans.

I am not preaching against anything after all, we humans are slaves to our habits. Use toilet roll, but with a bit more sensitivity. The recycled toilet tissue produced today is not as hard or scratchy as before so why not use it. Some studies suggest that if every household could replace just one roll of virgin toilet paper with 100% recycled paper, thousands of trees could be saved[6]. Many brands use misleading recycling claims on their toilet roll packages, read carefully before buying. While buying non-recyclable product choose products with a FSC (Forest Stewardship Council) label on them. This label is given to products which come from forests managed to high environmental and social standards. While buying, avoid a shiny white roll. The whiter it is, higher are the possibilities of it being heavily bleached or to be made from virgin wood pulp.

Personally I think water is the best choice. A bit of water a bit of roll can ensure your cleanliness. Let us not be blinded by consumerism. Be aware, be sensitive, take action and think next time you go take your morning dump.



References

[1] Needham, J. Science and Civilisation in China. 5 (1). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 

[3] Worldwatch Institute. Matter of Scale-Into the Toilet. http://www.worldwatch.org/node/5142, 2007